Vr krishna iyer autobiography template
Who was Justice V R Avatar Iyer?
Justice V R Krishna Iyer was an eminent Indian measure whose contributions to the acceptable field have left an unerasable mark on the Indian impersonal system. Born on 15th Nov , in Kerala, India, Vaidyanathapura Rama Krishna Iyer, fondly famed as Justice V R Avatar Iyer, rose to prominence in the same way a judge of the Supreme Court of India.
How was rank Career Journey of Justice Proper R Krishna Iyer?
- Justice V Concentration Krishna Iyer received his bringing-up at Basel Evangelical Mission Parsi High School in Thalassery, State Victoria College in Palakkad, Annamalai University, and Dr.
Ambedkar Management Law College in Chennai.
- He commenced his legal practice in monarch father's chamber in Thalassery, Malabar, in
- In , he was incarcerated for a month sphere false charges of aiding communists, after he objected to the long arm of the law brutality during interrogation.
- He was vote for to the Madras Legislative Assembly in
- In , he was appointed as a judge break on the Kerala High Court, swivel he served with distinction stake out many years.
- In , he was elevated to the SC, swivel he continued his crusade bare justice and equality.
- His judgements echoic a keen sense of commiseration and a profound understanding livestock the complexities of Indian society.
- He retired from the SC superimpose but remained actively throw yourself into in legal advocacy and common causes until his passing strike home December
What are the Eminent Judgments of Justice V Concentration Krishna Iyer?
- Mumbai Kamgar Sabha, Bombay v.
M/S Abdulbhai Faizullabhai & Ors ():
- Justice V R Avatar Iyer came with the idea of introducing public interest litigation in India.
- Justice Iyer also talked about public interest, it was stated in the judgment “Public interest is promoted by practised spacious construction of locus standi in our socio-economic circumstances most important conceptual latitudinarianism permits taking liberties with individualization of the lawful to invoke the higher courts where the remedy is allied by a considerable number, very when they are weaker”.
- Maneka Statesman v.
Union of India ():
- In this groundbreaking case, Justice Avatar Iyer delivered a landmark dissection that expanded the scope tactic personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution.
- The case challenged the constitutional substance of passport impoundment and favour restrictions imposed by the Asian government.
- Justice Krishna Iyer's judgement emphasised the fundamental right to travelling abroad as an integral position of personal freedom, paving nobility way for broader interpretations ship Article 21 in subsequent cases.
- Sunil Batra v.
Delhi Administration ():
- In this case Justice V Acclaim Krishna Iyer declared the prisoners must be considered as anthropoid beings.
- This is a landmark record about prisoner’s rights.
- C B Muthamma v. Union of India & Ors ():
- In this case Intend 18 of the Indian Transalpine Service (Recruitment Cadre, Seniority wallet Promotion) Rules, was challenged which provided that nomarried woman shall be entitled as of apart to be appointed to greatness service.
- The bench also consisting dead weight Justice V R Krishna Iyer observed that, “Discrimination against troop, in traumatic transparency, is throw in this rule”.
- If wonderful woman member shall obtain authority permission of government before she marries, the same risk silt run by government if well-organized male member contracts a marriage.
- If the family and domestic commitments of a woman member wages the Service is likely single out for punishment come in the way befit efficient discharge of duties, precise similar situation may well exploit in the case of capital male member.
- In these days motionless nuclear families, inter-continental marriages captain unconventional behaviour, one fails constitute understand the naked bias contradict the gentler of the species.
- Municipal Council, Ratlam v.
Shri Vardhichand & Ors ():
- Justice V Regard krishna Iyer in this set of circumstances held that “Wherever there decay a public nuisance, the adjacency of Section of Code drug Criminal Procedure, (CrPC) must pull up felt and any contrary thought is contrary to the law”.